Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1692921
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (19)



 


 



Retribution and the Experience of Punishment


John Bronsteen


Loyola University Chicago School of Law

Christopher J. Buccafusco


Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law

Jonathan S. Masur


University of Chicago - Law School

October 15, 2010

California Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 5, October 2010
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 321

Abstract:     
In a prior article, we argued that punishment theorists need to take into account the counterintuitive findings from hedonic psychology about how offenders typically experience punishment. Punishment generally involves the imposition of negative experience. The reason that greater fines and prison sentences constitute more severe punishments than lesser ones is, in large part, that they are assumed to impose greater negative experience. Hedonic adaptation reduces that difference in negative experience, thereby undermining efforts to achieve proportionality in punishment. Anyone who values punishing more serious crimes more severely than less serious crimes by an appropriate amount - as virtually everyone does - must therefore confront the implications of hedonic adaptation. Moreover, the unadaptable negativity of post-prison life which is caused by the experience of imprisonment results in punishments that go on far longer than is typically assumed. Objectivist retributive theories that fail to incorporate these facts risk creating grossly excessive punishments. Certain retributivists have disputed the claim that adaptation is important to punishment theory, but their arguments are unavailing.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: punishment, retribution, adaptation, prison, incarceration

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 18, 2010 ; Last revised: August 14, 2012

Suggested Citation

Bronsteen, John and Buccafusco, Christopher J. and Masur, Jonathan S., Retribution and the Experience of Punishment (October 15, 2010). California Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 5, October 2010; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 321. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1692921

Contact Information

John Bronsteen
Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-654-1511 (Phone)
312-915-7201 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.luc.edu/law/faculty/bronsteen.shtml

Christopher J. Buccafusco
Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )
565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661-3691
United States
312-906-5163 (Phone)

Jonathan S. Masur (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773.702.5188 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/masur/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,021
Downloads: 380
Download Rank: 42,526
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  19
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds