Abstract

 
 

Citations



 


 



Hypothesis Testing in Econometrics


Joseph P. Romano


Stanford University - Department of Statistics

Azeem Shaikh


University of Chicago

Michael Wolf


University of Zurich - Department of Economics Library; University of Zurich - Department of Eonomics

February 2010

Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 75-104, 2010

Abstract:     
This article reviews important concepts and methods that are useful for hypothesis testing. First, we discuss the Neyman-Pearson framework. Various approaches to optimality are presented, including finite-sample and large-sample optimality. Then, we summarize some of the most important methods, as well as resampling methodology, which is useful to set critical values. Finally, we consider the problem of multiple testing, which has witnessed a burgeoning literature in recent years. Along the way, we incorporate some examples that are current in the econometrics literature. While many problems with well-known successful solutions are included, we also address open problems that are not easily handled with current technology, stemming from such issues as lack of optimality or poor asymptotic approximations.

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: October 18, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Romano, Joseph P., Shaikh, Azeem and Wolf, Michael, Hypothesis Testing in Econometrics (February 2010). Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 75-104, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1693020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124342

Contact Information

Joseph P. Romano (Contact Author)
Stanford University - Department of Statistics ( email )
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
Azeem Shaikh
University of Chicago ( email )
1101 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Michael Wolf
University of Zurich - Department of Economics Library ( email )
Rämistrasse 71
Zurich, 8006
Switzerland
University of Zurich - Department of Eonomics ( email )
Wilfriedstrasse 6
Zurich, CH-8032
Switzerland
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 229

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds