Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1693030
 
 

Footnotes (558)



 


 



E-Discovery's Threat to Civil Litigation: Reevaluating Rule 26 for the Digital Age


Robert Hardaway


University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Dustin D. Berger


Columbia University

Andrea DeField


University of Denver Sturm College of Law

September 1, 2010

Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 63, p.521, 2011

Abstract:     
Changes in technology allow litigants to create and store much more information than has ever been possible before. Unfortunately, the costs of searching through litigants’ ever-growing sources of electronically stored information threaten to undermine the civil litigation system. Indeed, we argue that a typical civil litigant cannot sustain the costs of the discovery-related litigation. As a result, many civil litigants will never be able to obtain a judicial resolution of the merits of their case. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, even as amended in 2006 specifically to address the costs and scale of e-discovery, not only fail to contain the cost or scope of discovery, but, in fact, encourage expensive litigation ancillary to the merits of civil litigants’ cases. The solution to this dilemma is to eliminate the presumption that the producing party should pay for the cost of discovery in favor of a rule that would equally distribute the costs of discovery to the requesting and producing parties. While other commentators have proposed a variety of solutions to this problem, the other proposed solutions are generally inadequate because they fail to address the underlying cause of the rising costs and scope of e-discovery. We demonstrate how mandatory cost sharing gives all parties the incentive to control the cost and scale of e-discovery. We also show that some state and many foreign jurisdictions have rejected the presumption that the producer pay for the costs of discovery, thereby demonstrating that the producer-pays presumption is not essential to the operation of a civil justice system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 77

Keywords: e-Discovery, Discovery, Sanctions, Litigation, Spoliation, Databases, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 17, 2010 ; Last revised: August 10, 2014

Suggested Citation

Hardaway, Robert and Berger, Dustin D. and DeField, Andrea, E-Discovery's Threat to Civil Litigation: Reevaluating Rule 26 for the Digital Age (September 1, 2010). Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 63, p.521, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1693030

Contact Information

Robert Hardaway
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
Dustin D. Berger (Contact Author)
Columbia University ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
Andrea DeField
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 839
Downloads: 180
Download Rank: 97,620
Footnotes:  558

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.469 seconds