Abstract

 
 

References (36)



 


 



Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Endogenous Liquidity


Emilio Osambela


Carnegie Mellon University - David A. Tepper School of Business

June 23, 2012


Abstract:     
This article studies a dynamic general-equilibrium economy in which one population of optimistic investors is subject to endogenous liquidity constraints, that prevent default due to ex-ante limited commitment. We find a joint feedback effect between sentiment driven by optimistic investors and endogenous liquidity: lower sentiment decreases liquidity, and lower liquidity increases sentiment. Even though liquidity decreases are predictable they are priced, because they impact the magnitude of the market price of sentiment risk. The joint feedback effect between sentiment and endogenous liquidity produces rich dynamics for stock return and its volatility. We show that the model can quantitatively generate volatility clustering at different frequencies, asymmetry in the stock-return volatility relationship, and the negative pricing of stock-return volatility in expected stock return. In addition, the model provides unique predictions on the co-movement of endogenous liquidity, the equity premium, the interest rate, and stock-return volatility at different frequencies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: Heterogeneous Beliefs, Liquidity, Default, Volatility

JEL Classification: G10,G12

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 21, 2010 ; Last revised: June 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Osambela, Emilio, Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Endogenous Liquidity (June 23, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1694330 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1694330

Contact Information

Emilio Osambela (Contact Author)
Carnegie Mellon University - David A. Tepper School of Business ( email )
5000 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,526
Downloads: 247
Download Rank: 60,016
References:  36

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.844 seconds