Purposeful Ambiguity as International Legal Strategy: The Two China Problem
Northwestern University - School of Law
October 19, 2010
THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AT THE THRESHOLD OF THE 21ST CENTURY: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF KRZYSZTOF SKUBISZEWSKI, pp. 109-121, Jerzy Makarczyk, ed., Kluwer, 1996
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-63
For every definable term in international law there are clear cases and fuzzy cases. Everyone accepts that the term “state” applies to Paraguay, Poland, Portugal and over a hundred other clear cases, but does it apply to Puerto Rico, Western Samoa, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands, Gibraltar, or the Vatican City? The word “treaty” has thousands of clear applications, but does it apply to an exchange of faxes between two governments or a handshake between two diplomats at a cocktail party? In addition to ambiguities of this kind, international law is replete with deliberately created ambiguities. One of the most interesting situations in recent years that illustrates in several important ways the role of deliberate ambiguity in international law is the Two China Problem.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Keywords: Two China Problem, Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, Show of force in the Taiwan Strait (1996), Unilateral Treaty, Ambiguity, Treaties
JEL Classification: K33, K10, K30Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 22, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.437 seconds