Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1694902
 
 

Footnotes (69)



 


 



Section 199 of the Equality Act 2010: How Not to Abolish the Presumption of Advancement


Jamie Glister


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

October 19, 2010

Modern Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 807-823, 2010
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 10/99

Abstract:     
Section 199 of the Equality Act 2010 seeks to abolish the equitable presumption of advancement. The existence of that presumption, which discriminates according to gender because it applies in relation to husbands and fathers but not wives and mothers, is thought to prevent the United Kingdom from acceding to Protocol 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This paper argues that the presumption of advancement would not breach the protocol. It further argues that, even on the assumption that abolition was necessary before accession could occur, the legislation will not have the intended effect. The paper concludes that section 199 should be brought into force only in part.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: trusts, equity, presumption of advancement, human rights

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 21, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Glister, Jamie, Section 199 of the Equality Act 2010: How Not to Abolish the Presumption of Advancement (October 19, 2010). Modern Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 807-823, 2010; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 10/99. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1694902

Contact Information

Jamie Glister (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,254
Downloads: 312
Download Rank: 53,959
Footnotes:  69

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds