The Sources of Value Destruction in Acquisitions by Entrenched Managers
Dublin City University; Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR); University of New South Wales (UNSW) - School of Banking and Finance; Financial Research Network (FIRN)
University of Washington; Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR)
UNSW Australia Business School; Financial Research Network (FIRN); Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR)
October 20, 2010
Paris December 2010 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI - AFFI
Prior work has established that entrenched managers make value-decreasing acquisitions. In this study, we ask how exactly they destroy that value. We hypothesize that rising equity values loosen financial constraints, much like free cash flow does, allowing entrenched managers to pursue more acquisitions in the first place. We further test whether entrenched managers simply overpay for good targets or actually choose targets with lower synergies. We find support for the latter. Overall, we find that value destruction by entrenched managers comes from a combination of factors. First, they disproportionately avoid private targets, which have been shown to be generally associated with value creation. Second, when they do buy private targets, they tend to use cash instead of equity, avoiding the creation of a valuable blockholder. Third, they are particularly active during times of high equity valuation, even though their own equity is not as highly valued as other bidders’ equity. Finally, they choose targets with low synergies, as shown by combined announcement returns and post-merger operating performance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Mergers, Entrenchment, Overvalued Equity, Overpayment
JEL Classification: G34, G32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 21, 2010 ; Last revised: October 17, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds