Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1695197
 


 



Paramount: The Mixed Merits of Mush


Alan E. Garfield


Widener University - School of Law

1992

Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 17, 1992

Abstract:     
The Article critiques the Delaware Supreme Court’s 1990 decision, Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc. It argues that Paramount left no clear standards in its wake. While the decision seemed to lean in favor of more managerial discretion in the takeover context, it was not clear how far it leaned, or how closely tied the court’s reasoning was to the peculiar facts of the case. While other commentators critiqued Paramount for its management bias, this article instead focuses on the decision’s murkiness. It considers the merits of moving takeover jurisprudence away from the clearer standards that had been evolving in the lower courts. It considers whether an undefined standard that gives courts broad discretion to evaluate management defensive actions is appropriate in light of the complexity of the takeover phenomenon.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: corporation law, Delaware, takeovers

JEL Classification: K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 22, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Garfield, Alan E., Paramount: The Mixed Merits of Mush (1992). Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 17, 1992. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1695197

Contact Information

Alan E. Garfield (Contact Author)
Widener University - School of Law ( email )
4601 Concord Pike
P.O. Box 7286
Wilmington, DE 19803-0474
United States
HOME PAGE: http://law.widener.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 226
Downloads: 15

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.250 seconds