MoneyBombs and Democratic Participation: Regulating Internet Fundraising
Nathaniel Jurist Gleicher
Yale Information Society Project; Yale University
October 4, 2010
Maryland Law Review, Forthcoming
In the last decade, the Internet has upended the world of political fundraising, helping campaigns marshal armies of small donors and volunteers. Rather than eliminating the need for fundraising organizations that intermediate between candidates and constituents, as some predicted, the Internet has created new intermediaries that capitalize on the rapidly changing ecology of online fundraising. These new intermediaries combine fundraising, volunteer mobilization and activism. They raise new risks of accountability, polarization, and nationalized debate, but also have the potential to greatly enhance democratic participation. Although online campaigning is currently largely unregulated, numerous proposals to change this have been advanced in recent years. This Article contrasts online and offline fundraising intermediaries, and uses the differences that it identifies to evaluate several regulatory proposals. It is a guide to regulating online political fundraising and to ensuring that regulation avoids unintended consequences, minimizes the risks of online fundraising, and reinforces its promise of enhanced democratic participation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 84
Keywords: online fundraising, internet, politics, fundraising, fundraising intermediaries, political campaigns, democratic participationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 28, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds