|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1695666. ; Size: 121K
|
|
Does Shareholder Proxy Access Improve Firm Value? Evidence from the Business Roundtable Challenge
Bo Becker Harvard Business School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Daniel Bergstresser Harvard Business School
Guhan Subramanian Harvard Business School
January 19, 2012
Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 11-052 Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 11-052 Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 685
Abstract:
We use the Business Roundtable’s challenge to the SEC’s 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment to measure the value of shareholder proxy access. We find that firms that would have been most vulnerable to proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership and activist institutional ownership in particular, lost value on October 4, 2010, when the SEC unexpectedly announced that it would delay implementation of the Rule in response to the Business Roundtable challenge. We also examine intra-day returns and find that the value loss occurred just after the SEC’s announcement on October 4. We find similar results on July 22, 2011, when the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of the Business Roundtable. These findings are consistent with the view that financial markets placed a positive value on shareholder access, as implemented in the SEC’s 2010 Rule.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Keywords: Shareholder proxy access, Corporate governance
JEL Classification: G14, G32, G34, G38
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: March 14, 2012
Suggested CitationBecker, Bo, Bergstresser, Daniel B. and Subramanian, Guhan, Does Shareholder Proxy Access Improve Firm Value? Evidence from the Business Roundtable Challenge (January 19, 2012). Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 11-052; Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 11-052; Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 685. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1695666 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1695666
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
Paper statistics
Download Rank:
|
8,722
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance Around the World
By
Peter Iliev,
Karl Lins, ...
2.
The Insignificance of Proxy Access
By
Marcel Kahan
and
Edward Rock
3.
Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors
By
Joseph Mccahery,
Laura Starks, ...
4.
Staggered Boards and the Wealth of Shareholders: Evidence from Two Natural Experiments
By
Lucian Bebchuk,
Alma Cohen, ...
5.
The Law and Economics of Blockholder Disclosure
By
Lucian Bebchuk
and
Robert Jackson
6.
Shareholder Litigation in Mergers and Acquisitions
By
C. N. V. Krishnan,
Ronald Masulis, ...
7.
The Corporate Governance Provisions of Dodd-Frank
By
Stephen Bainbridge
8.
A Review of Empirical Capital Structure Research and Directions for the Future
By
John Graham
and
Mark Leary
9.
Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: Hysteresis, Implementation, and Enforcement
By
Hans Christensen,
Luzi Hail, ...
10.
Cyclicality, Performance Measurement, and Cash Flow Liquidity in Private Equity
By
David Robinson
and
Berk Sensoy
|
|
|
|