Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1695958
 


 



Associational Standing: A Comparison between the American and Argentinian Systems


Daniel R. Ortiz


University of Virginia School of Law

Juan Cruz Azzarri


Perez Alati, Grondona, Benites, Arntsen & Martinez de Hoz (h)

October 22, 2010

El Derecho, Forthcoming
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2010-33

Abstract:     
This paper in Spanish compares United States and Argentinian judicial standing requirements for groups. Both countries have developed two strands of group standing: organizational and associational. Under the former, less controversial type, groups can sue on their own behalf; under the latter, on behalf of one or more members. The more controversial form seeks to address certain collective action problems that frustrate participation by those who suffer diffuse injury in both legal systems. United States and Argentinian doctrine track each other in large part.

In one fundamental respect, however, United States associational standing is more restrictive than its Argentinian counterpart. American doctrine requires that at least one member of the organization have suffered an injury germane to the association’s interests before the organization can sue to vindicate that interest or that, at the least, those injured have some voice within the organization. Argentinian law does not. In many cases, of course, this difference does not matter. American organizations can in many contexts easily identify and assert injuries suffered by their members. In some cases, however, it does matter. When it does, the difference reflects less a formal concern with whether “interests” or “injuries” should count than a practical concern with organizational governance. By requiring injury to a member or voice from one affected, United States law ensures to some degree that the interests of those affected by a decision to review administrative action will be heard within the organization when it is making that decision. Argentinian law, by contrast, allows an organization to sue to vindicate the interests it was designed to pursue without such “representation.”

Note: Downloadable document is in Spanish.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 23, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Ortiz, Daniel R. and Azzarri, Juan Cruz, Associational Standing: A Comparison between the American and Argentinian Systems (October 22, 2010). El Derecho, Forthcoming; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2010-33. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1695958

Contact Information

Daniel R. Ortiz (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
804-924-3127 (Phone)
804-924-7536 (Fax)

Juan Cruz Azzarri
Perez Alati, Grondona, Benites, Arntsen & Martinez de Hoz (h) ( email )
Suipacha 1111
Piso 18
Buenos Aires, C1008AAW
Argentina
(54-11) 4114-3078 (Phone)
(54-11) 4114-3001/2 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 506
Downloads: 41

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds