Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1696138
 


 



The Paradoxes of Oklahoma’s Amazon Statute: Weak Duties, Expansive Coverage, Often Superfluous, Constitutionally Infirm


Edward A. Zelinsky


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


State Tax Notes, Forthcoming
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 315

Abstract:     
Oklahoma’s new Amazon law is a paradoxical statute. That law imposes a weak enforcement responsibility, namely, the obligation to post notices on websites, catalogs and invoices of consumers’ obligation to pay the Oklahoma use tax on internet and mail order purchases of tangible personal property. However, the Oklahoma law paradoxically imposes this tepid notification responsibility aggressively upon a broader class of internet and mail order retailers than is encompassed by New York’s or Colorado’s Amazon act.

When the Oklahoma law imposes its use tax notification responsibility upon out-of-state sellers with no physical presence in Oklahoma, the law unconstitutionally contravenes the dormant Commerce Clause physical presence nexus test articulated in National Bellas Hess and Quill. When the Oklahoma act constitutionally compels its use tax notification duty upon firms which are physically present in the Sooner State, those firms are already obligated to collect Oklahoma use tax by virtue of the use tax statute’s agency provisions. Hence, the second paradox of the Oklahoma Amazon statute: When it is constitutional, the statute is superfluous; when it is innovative, Oklahoma’s Amazon law is unconstitutional.

The ultimate responsibility for this unsatisfactory situation lies with Congress which has the authority to empower the states to impose sales and use tax collection responsibilities on all remote sellers. Federal legislation in this area is long overdue.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 67

Keywords: sales tax, use tax, mail order sales, remote sales, internet sales, nexus, physical presence, Quill, National Bellas Hess, Complete Auto, Amazon law, dormant Commerce Clause, electronic retailer

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 24, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Zelinsky, Edward A., The Paradoxes of Oklahoma’s Amazon Statute: Weak Duties, Expansive Coverage, Often Superfluous, Constitutionally Infirm. State Tax Notes, Forthcoming; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 315. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1696138

Contact Information

Edward A. Zelinsky (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0277 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 520
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 179,451

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds