References (14)



Measuring Investors' Historical Returns: Hindsight Bias in Dollar-Weighted Returns

Simon Hayley

City University London - Sir John Cass Business School

March 12, 2012

Midwest Finance Association 2012 Annual Meetings Paper

A growing number of studies use dollar-weighted returns as evidence that consistently bad timing substantially reduces investor returns, and that consequently the equity risk premium must be considerably lower than previously thought. These studies measure the impact of bad timing as the difference between the geometric mean return (corresponding to a buy-and-hold strategy) and the dollar-weighted return. However, the present paper demonstrates that this differential combines two distinct effects: The correlation of investor cashflows with (i) future asset returns, and (ii) past asset returns. Both correlations tend to alter the dollar-weighted return, but only the first affects investors’ expected wealth. The second generates a hindsight bias.

This paper also derives a method which separates these two effects. The results show that the great majority of the return differential for mainstream US equities has been due to hindsight bias, and very little due to bad investor timing. Dollar-weighted returns have been low because aggregate investment flows reflect past returns rather than future returns, and these low returns should not lead us to adopt correspondingly low estimates of the risk premium. The decomposition method which is derived here also has many applications in other fields where dollar-weighted returns are used, such as project finance and investment management.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: investment, equity risk premium, dollar-weighted return

JEL Classification: G11, G12, G15

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: October 28, 2010 ; Last revised: March 16, 2012

Suggested Citation

Hayley, Simon, Measuring Investors' Historical Returns: Hindsight Bias in Dollar-Weighted Returns (March 12, 2012). Midwest Finance Association 2012 Annual Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698088 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1698088

Contact Information

Simon Hayley (Contact Author)
City University London - Sir John Cass Business School ( email )
106 Bunhill Row
London, EC1Y 8TZ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,413
Downloads: 247
Download Rank: 74,126
References:  14
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Expectation Traps and Discretion
By Varadarajan Chari, Lawrence Christiano, ...

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds