Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698090
 
 

References (755)



 
 

Citations



 


 



Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory


Hugo Mercier


University of Neuchatel

Dan Sperber


affiliation not provided to SSRN

June 26, 2010

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 57-74, 2011

Abstract:     
Reasoning is generally seen as a means to improve knowledge and make better decisions. However, much evidence shows that reasoning often leads to epistemic distortions and poor decisions. This suggests that the function of reasoning should be rethought. Our hypothesis is that the function of reasoning is argumentative. It is to devise and evaluate arguments intended to persuade. Reasoning so conceived is adaptive given the exceptional dependence of humans on communication and their vulnerability to misinformation. A wide range of evidence in the psychology of reasoning and decision making can be reinterpreted and better explained in the light of this hypothesis. Poor performance in standard reasoning tasks is explained by the lack of argumentative context. When the same problems are placed in a proper argumentative setting, people turn out to be skilled arguers. Skilled arguers, however, are not after the truth but after arguments supporting their views. This explains the notorious confirmation bias. This bias is apparent not only when people are actually arguing but also when they are reasoning proactively from the perspective of having to defend their opinions. Reasoning so motivated can distort evaluations and attitudes and allow erroneous beliefs to persist. Proactively used reasoning also favors decisions that are easy to justify but not necessarily better. In all these instances traditionally described as failures or flaws, reasoning does exactly what can be expected of an argumentative device: Look for arguments that support a given conclusion, and, ceteris paribus, favor conclusions for which arguments can be found.

Keywords: argumentation, confirmation bias, decision making, dual process theory, evolutionary psychology, motivated reasoning, reason-based choice, reasoning

JEL Classification: D70

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: October 28, 2010 ; Last revised: June 21, 2011

Suggested Citation

Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan, Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory (June 26, 2010). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 57-74, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698090

Contact Information

Hugo Mercier (Contact Author)
University of Neuchatel ( email )
Espace Louis Agassiz 1
Neuchâtel, 2000
Switzerland
Dan Sperber
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 28,659
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds