Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698168
 


 



On Legal Subterfuge and the So-Called 'Lawfare' Debate


Leila N. Sadat


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

Jing Geng


Utrecht University


Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-10-06

Abstract:     
The term "lawfare" is a contentious and ideologically charged concept as evidenced in its contemporary, popular usage. There are many nuances to the term, though lawfare is generally defined as a tactic of war where the use of law replaces the use of weapons in the pursuit of a military objective. Lawfare proponents increasingly claim that adversaries of the United States are manipulating the rule of law to undermine democracy and national security. The term "lawfare" is applied to contexts as varying as habeas corpus petitions of Guantanamo detainees, lawsuits by individuals subjected to torture or extraordinary rendition, universal jurisdiction, hate speech litigation, and the Goldstone Report. This essay explores some preliminary etymological background on the term to explain its current use and misuse. It argues that lawfare is an unhelpful term that has no real fixed meaning. Lawfare is a concept that may be catchy in media communications, but its distorted usage has substituted careful analysis and discourse with a fruitless – and even dangerous – rhetorical debate. The notion that terrorists are using the rules of humanitarian law, domestic law and human rights law to gain improper advantages over the United States undermines general respect for the rule of law. Alternatively, equal application of domestic and international legal rules and legal processes to both rich and poor, powerful and weak, creates a better ordered community rooted in peace and stability. Ultimately, this essay concludes with some concrete suggestions on how to move forward from the usage of this singularly unhelpful term.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: lawfare, international law, international human rights law, international humanitarian law, terrorism, rule of law, laws of war, national security

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 27, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Sadat, Leila N. and Geng, Jing, On Legal Subterfuge and the So-Called 'Lawfare' Debate. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Forthcoming; Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-10-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698168

Contact Information

Leila N. Sadat (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
314-935-6411 (Phone)
314-935-5356 (Fax)
Jing Geng
Utrecht University ( email )
Vredenburg 138
Utrecht, 3511 BG
Netherlands
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 655
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 154,268

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds