Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698262
 


 



A Comparative Look at Three British Tax Cases


Joel S. Newman


Wake Forest University - School of Law

June 12, 1995

Tax Notes, Vol. 67, No. 1509, 1995

Abstract:     
A Comparative Look at Three British Tax Cases. Three well-known British tax cases, Watson v. Hornby, Sharkey v. Wernher, and Mason v. Innes, all involved what we in the United States would have designated as nontaxable, imputed income. Yet, the British ruled that two of them, Watson v. Hornby and Sharkey v. Wernher, involved taxable events, while the third, Mason v. Innes, did not. Mason v. Innes was distinguished because the alleged income in that case was that of a professional writer. Such income is taxable under a different schedule in the British system from the others. Furthermore, the income of writers does not involve the inventory accounting that was required in the first two cases.

Why did the British struggle to reconcile these three cases, when we in the United States would have had little difficulty in dismissing all three? The answer lies in the British schedular system. In the United States, everything that could conceivably be called taxable income is taxable. By contrast, in the British schedular system, only those items of income which fit into one of the designated schedules can be taxed. When the horses in Sharkey v. Wernher were transferred from a stud farm operation to the taxpayer’s racing stables, they were transferred from a taxable schedule to a nontaxable category. Therefore, if there had not been a taxable event upon the transfer, there would never have been a further opportunity to tax. It is this distinction between schedular, taxable categories, and nonschedular, nontaxable categories that led to the contortions in the three cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 28, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Newman, Joel S., A Comparative Look at Three British Tax Cases (June 12, 1995). Tax Notes, Vol. 67, No. 1509, 1995. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698262

Contact Information

Joel S. Newman (Contact Author)
Wake Forest University - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 291
Downloads: 46

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds