Abstract

 
 

References (67)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Information Asymmetries and Investor Reactions to Going Concern Audit Reports


Kim Ittonen


University of Vaasa - Department of Accounting and Finance

December 8, 2011


Abstract:     
The purpose of this paper is to examine whether and how the stock market reaction to auditors’ going concern reports is affected by information asymmetries. The paper uses a sample of 193 first time going concern audit reports issued for Russell 3000 firms between 2002 and 2008. Market-model abnormal returns around two event dates, the 10-K date and the audit report date, are used to measure the investor reactions to going concern reports. The hypotheses of the paper are investigated using an OLS regression. The results indicate that firm size and leverage mitigate the negative returns to the going concern information around the audit report date. As hypothesized, firm attributes that affect monitoring and reporting have a significant impact on the relevance and/or predictability of audit reports. For firms with larger information asymmetries the release of the audit report may be the first time investors receive information about going concern problems. Second, the results suggest that the audit report date provides a cleaner measure of the reaction to the going concern audit report than the date of the 10-K.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Going concern, audit report, information asymmetry

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 28, 2010 ; Last revised: January 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

Ittonen, Kim, Information Asymmetries and Investor Reactions to Going Concern Audit Reports (December 8, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1698595

Contact Information

Kim Ittonen (Contact Author)
University of Vaasa - Department of Accounting and Finance ( email )
P.O. Box 700
FIN-65101 Vaasa, FI-65101
Finland
+358-6-324-8535 (Phone)
+358-6-324-8344 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 882
Downloads: 351
Download Rank: 39,958
References:  67
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.922 seconds