Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1701278
 
 

Footnotes (47)



 


 



The Curse of Bigness and the Optimal Size of Class Actions


Alexandra D. Lahav


University of Connecticut - School of Law

November 1, 2010

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc, Vol. 63, p. 117, 2010

Abstract:     
How big is too big when it comes to class actions? This short essay, written for the Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc roundtable on Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. examines that question. Size in itself should not be a barrier to certification, but courts may rightly be concerned with variation within the class. Variation causes manageability problems, but in some cases (like Dukes) variation can be managed within the class context by judicious use of statistical methods. I also demonstrate why the related argument that this class ought not be certified because it is too big and Wal-Mart will be forced to settle the case out of duress is misguided.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Wal-Mart, complex litigation, class action, class certification, employment discrimination, Title VII, statistical adjudication, bellwether trials, aggregate proof

JEL Classification: K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Lahav, Alexandra D., The Curse of Bigness and the Optimal Size of Class Actions (November 1, 2010). Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc, Vol. 63, p. 117, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1701278

Contact Information

Alexandra D. Lahav (Contact Author)
University of Connecticut - School of Law ( email )
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 596
Downloads: 83
Download Rank: 179,833
Footnotes:  47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds