Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1701327
 


 



Confrontation and Hearsay Issues in Federal Court Terrorism Prosecutions of Gitmo Detainees - Moussaoui and Paracha as Harbingers


Norman Abrams


UCLA Law School

2010

Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 1067, 2010
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 10-28

Abstract:     
This paper was written for a feschrift in tribute to Professor Margaret Berger. It uses the 4th Circuit’s final direct appeal opinion in United States v. Moussaoui as a springboard for an examination of how certain types of confrontation and hearsay issues might be argued and decided in future terrorism prosecutions in the federal courts.

In addressing a compulsory process issue, the Moussaoui court developed arguments about the reliability of intelligence reports prepared by the government derived from the interrogation of three detainees. Moussaoui was seeking the testimony of these detainees: The Moussaoui court concluded that the statements recorded in the reports were obtained for terrorism intelligence purposes and that, in the circumstances, the statements included therein had sufficient reliability to permit their use as a substitute for in-person or deposition testimony, which the government on national security grounds had declined to make available.

The nature of the characterization of these reports by the Moussaoui court, albeit in a compulsory process context, lends itself to thinking about what would happen if similar intelligence reports are offered into evidence in future federal court terrorism prosecutions, but in a confrontation/hearsay context. This paper analyzes the issues that would be raised under the doctrines of Crawford v. Washington and Davis v. Washington as well as the Federal Rules of Evidence and assesses the likely success of such a use of the Moussaoui approach.

Keywords: United States v. Moussaoui, hearsay, terrorism, federal court

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: November 2, 2010 ; Last revised: November 4, 2010

Suggested Citation

Abrams, Norman, Confrontation and Hearsay Issues in Federal Court Terrorism Prosecutions of Gitmo Detainees - Moussaoui and Paracha as Harbingers (2010). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 1067, 2010; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 10-28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1701327

Contact Information

Norman Abrams (Contact Author)
UCLA Law School ( email )
Box 951476
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 317

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds