Carol M. Rose
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law
November 1, 2010
Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Vol. 22, No. 369, 2010
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 10-38
Many scholars of law and economics have taken an interest in game theory. This article, part of a symposium on new developments in law and literature, focuses on the narrative structures of the most standard of the game theory names: Prisoners’ Dilemma, Battle of the Sexes, Chicken, and Stag Hunt. These names tell stories, and the stories breathe life into the game theory matrices that they exemplify. While other names and situations could have illustrated the games’ strategic elements, these standard stories all have a punchy and somewhat macho appeal. The most cited of all is Prisoners’ Dilemma, even though, oddly enough, it is the least punchy and the least macho of all; and even though it blurs with the other stories, particularly when iterated. The article queries the particular appeal of Prisoners’ Dilemma, and concludes that among other things, an offbeat and unfortunately unexplored promise of redemption is one source of the PD story’s great appeal.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: game theory, law and literature, prisoner's dilemma, stag hunt, chicken, legal storytelling
JEL Classification: K10, K11, K12, C70, Z10
Date posted: November 1, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds