Implications of International Investment Law for Tobacco Flavouring Regulation
Tania S.L. Voon
University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School
Andrew D. Mitchell
University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School; NYU School of Law
October 27, 2010
Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011
U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 538
Several countries now restrict the use of particular ‘flavours’ in cigarettes and other tobacco products. Various flavours may make cigarettes more attractive to consumers in general (for example by making them easier to smoke) or to particular groups such as children and young people. Domestic regulatory measures restricting tobacco flavouring therefore have a clear health objective. Nevertheless, tobacco companies may threaten to challenge these measures under international investment law, as they have done recently in relation to other tobacco control measures. Understanding the nuances and complexities of bilateral investment treaties (and investment chapters of preferential trade agreements) is therefore crucial for governments in designing flavouring measures and withstanding complaints in the context of foreign investment. Investment obligations do typically incorporate flexibility for governments to implement public health and other public policies, but governments must carefully craft flavouring measures for the relevant health purpose, avoiding unnecessary discrimination against foreign investors or investment. Governments should also take care in making any representations to existing or potential investors about the future of tobacco regulation in their territory. An analysis of flavouring measures under international investment law is vitally important as the Fourth Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control gets underway.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: Bilateral investment treaty, Public health, Tobacco, WHO, FCTC, International investment law
JEL Classification: K33, F02, F15
Date posted: November 4, 2010 ; Last revised: April 7, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds