Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1703123
 
 

Footnotes (106)



 


 



After Frustration: Three Cheers for Chandler v. Webster


Victor P. Goldberg


Columbia Law School

November 4, 2010

Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 382

Abstract:     
Performance of a contract can be excused by a number of circumstances, notably impossibility, impracticability, and frustration. When performance is excused there remains the question of how to treat any payments or expenditures that were made prior to the occurrence of the contract-frustrating event. In Chandler v. Webster, the English courts decided over a century ago that the parties should be left where they were at the time of the frustrating event. Forty years later that holding was overturned so that now recovery might be had both for restitution of payments made prior to the event and for expenditures made in reliance on the contract. American law, as embodied in the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, has also favored restitution with some concern for reliance. Both the English and the American responses emphasize the injustice of the Chandler solution.

This paper argues that the English and American rules both got it wrong. By emphasizing ex post justice rather than ex ante planning, they both propose default rules that are difficult to interpret and somewhat sticky. The paper first traces the development of the English rule from Taylor v. Caldwell through the most recent application of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act. It then considers the American majority rule as presented in the Restatement, which focuses on a particular context: a contract to work on an existing structure which is destroyed prior to completion of the contracted work. After considering some of the problems with the Restatement resolution, I consider the contractual solution which, it turns out, rejects the Restatement rule, opting instead for the Chandler rule.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 20, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Goldberg, Victor P., After Frustration: Three Cheers for Chandler v. Webster (November 4, 2010). Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 382. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1703123 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1703123

Contact Information

Victor Paul Goldberg (Contact Author)
Columbia Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
212-854-8380 (Phone)
212-854-0221 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 827
Downloads: 130
Download Rank: 131,291
Footnotes:  106

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds