Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1703431
 
 

Footnotes (251)



 


 



Apportioning Liability Behind a Veil of Uncertainty


Shahar Dillbary


University of Alabama School of Law

November 5, 2010

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 62, p. 1729, 2011
University of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1703431

Abstract:     
This article challenges the reason that led most states to abandon the “no contribution” rule. Under the rule if a victim obtains a judgment against two tortfeasors but chooses (even arbitrarily or out of spite) to recover only from one, the “chosen one” must pay the entire judgment while the other is exempt although both are liable. This is the case even if the paying tortfeasor is only 1% at fault while the non-paying tortfeasor is 99% at fault. The rule has been lamented by tort reform crusaders as immoral and unfair. One tortfeasor, the argument goes, should not bear the entire burden while the more culpable tortfeasor is exempted from liability. In deviation from the prior literature, the article employs economic theory to show that the “no contribution” rule that has been crowned as efficient is fair and just. It adopts a contractarian approach to analyze different apportionment regimes including joint and several liability (with and without contribution), several liability and market share liability. Relying on modern decision theory the article shows that individuals behind a veil of ignorance, unaware as to whether they would be victims or injurers may in fact choose the much criticized "no contribution" rule. In doing so the article sheds new light on a fierce and ongoing debate and concludes with a new framework for analyzing apportionment policies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: Apportionment, Contribution, Joint and Several Liability, Market Share Liability, Rawls, Veil of Ignorance, Harsanyi, Fairness, Justice, Economic Analysis

JEL Classification: K13, D61, D63, D31, A12, A13

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 6, 2010 ; Last revised: September 3, 2011

Suggested Citation

Dillbary, Shahar, Apportioning Liability Behind a Veil of Uncertainty (November 5, 2010). Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 62, p. 1729, 2011; University of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1703431. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1703431

Contact Information

Shahar John Dillbary (Contact Author)
University of Alabama School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,676
Downloads: 533
Download Rank: 26,644
Footnotes:  251

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.329 seconds