|
||||
|
||||
Is Corporate Hedging Consistent with Value Maximization? An Empirical Analysis
John R. Graham Duke University - Fuqua School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Daniel A. Rogers Portland State University - School of Business Administration June 25, 1999 Abstract: We study the derivative holdings of firms facing interest rate and/or currency risk. We net long and short positions to measure the extent of hedging with net notional values. We find that hedging increases with expected financial distress costs, firm size, and investment opportunities. Our evidence is also consistent with firms hedging to increase debt capacity and therefore firm value. We explicitly estimate the convexity in each firm's tax function but do not find evidence that convexity affects corporate hedging. We estimate that the potential increase in value related to tax convexity is much smaller than the tax gain associated with increased debt capacity.
JEL Classifications: G32, G39 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 26, 1999 ; Last revised: July 26, 1999Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.109 seconds.