Abstract

  
 

Footnotes (15)



 


 



Appendix A: Comparison to the Insurance Mandate Categorizations of Other Studies


I. Glenn Cohen


Harvard Law School

Daniel L. Chen


Duke University - School of Law
November 11, 2010

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2010

Abstract:     
This Web-Appendix for our Minnesota Law Review Article,"Trading-Off Reproductive Technology and Adoption: Does Subsidizing in Vitro Fertilization Decrease Adoption Rates and Should it Matter?," re-analyses our results using the insurance mandate categorization of other studies in the literature.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Reproductive Technology, Adoption, Family Law, Bioethics, Econometrics

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 10, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Cohen, I. Glenn and Chen, Daniel L., Appendix A: Comparison to the Insurance Mandate Categorizations of Other Studies (November 11, 2010). Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1707650

Contact Information

I. Glenn Cohen (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1525 Massachusetts Avenue
Griswold Hall 503
Cambridge, 02138
United States
Daniel L. Chen
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 262
Downloads: 20
Footnotes:  15

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds