Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1708183
 
 

Footnotes (184)



 


 



Procedure, Substance, and Erie


Jay Tidmarsh


Notre Dame Law School

November 12, 2010

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 64, p. 877, 2011
Notre Dame Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-36

Abstract:     
This Article examines the relationship between procedure and substance, and the way in which that relationship affects Erie questions. It first suggests that “procedure” should be understood in terms of process - in other words, in terms of the way that it changes the substance of the law and the value of legal claims. It then argues that the traditional view that the definitions of “procedure” and “substance change with the context - a pillar on which present Erie analysis is based - is wrong. Finally, it suggests a single process-based principle that reconciles all of the Supreme Court’s “procedural Erie” cases: that federal courts can apply their own rules to process a claim as long as, in a costless and outcome-neutral world, those rules do not affect the ex ante value of a claim at the time of its filing.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: Civil Procedure, Erie Doctrine, Federal Courts

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 13, 2010 ; Last revised: November 1, 2011

Suggested Citation

Tidmarsh, Jay, Procedure, Substance, and Erie (November 12, 2010). Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 64, p. 877, 2011; Notre Dame Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-36 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1708183

Contact Information

Jay Tidmarsh (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0399
United States
574-631-6985 (Phone)
574-631-4197 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 592
Downloads: 140
Download Rank: 120,001
Footnotes:  184

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds