Close Corporation Remedies and the Evolution of the Closely Held Firm
Larry E. Ribstein (Deceased)
University of Illinois College of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
November 16, 2010
Western New England Law Review, Forthcoming
Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS10-03
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 10-21
This paper examines the law of closely held firms from an evolutionary perspective. The corporate tax and constraints on the availability of limited liability forced closely held firms to compromise their planning objectives and choose standard forms that did not fully reflect their needs. This forced courts to construct duties and remedies that did not relate to the parties' contracts. The famous close corporation case of Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc. classically illustrates this problem. The advent and spread of the limited liability company significantly increased the availability of suitable standard forms for closely held firms. As a result, courts now can focus on fully effectuating the parties’ contracts rather than creating remedies the parties may not have wanted. This analysis has implications for potential improvements in contracting for closely held firms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
JEL Classification: K22
Date posted: November 16, 2010 ; Last revised: March 13, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds