Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1710466
 
 

Footnotes (116)



 


 



Why More Antitrust Immunity for the Media is a Bad Idea


Maurice E. Stucke


University of Tennessee College of Law

Allen P. Grunes


GeyerGorey LLP

November 17, 2010

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 105, p. 1399, 2011
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 134

Abstract:     
With their financial difficulties, some traditional media firms have called for greater leniency under the federal antitrust laws. The Federal Trade Commission, for example, in recent hearings inquired as to whether antitrust immunity is necessary for newspapers’ collaboration and under what circumstances, if any, antitrust immunity for certain joint conduct could be justified.

Our essay explores why relaxing the federal antitrust laws for traditional media will not help consumers or the marketplace of ideas. We discuss the past problems with antitrust immunity generally and for the media industries specifically. We address the failures of the Newspaper Preservation Act, how deregulation that followed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 failed to promote competition in the radio industry, and why further liberalizing the FCC’s cross-ownership rules to permit greater media consolidation will not promote competition in the marketplace of ideas.

We conclude that, because our democracy’s health depends on competition among traditional media, the cost of allowing already dominant firms to acquire the assets of their remaining competitors outweighs the benefits of looser antitrust laws.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Media, Sherman Act, Newspaper Preservation Act, 1996 Telecommunications Act, Cross-ownership Rules, Antitrust Immunity

JEL Classification: A10, K21, L40, L82

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2010 ; Last revised: February 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Stucke, Maurice E. and Grunes, Allen P., Why More Antitrust Immunity for the Media is a Bad Idea (November 17, 2010). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 105, p. 1399, 2011; University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 134. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1710466

Contact Information

Maurice E. Stucke (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 W. Cumberland Ave.
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States
865-974-9816 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.utk.edu/people/maurice-e-stucke/

Allen P. Grunes
GeyerGorey LLP ( email )
1776 I Street,N W
Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20004
United States
202-644-9760 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,835
Downloads: 163
Download Rank: 106,143
Footnotes:  116

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds