Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1711344
 


 



Rethinking Gender Equality in the Legal Profession's Pipeline to Power: A Study on Media Coverage of Supreme Court Nominees (Phase I, The Introduction Week)


Renee Newman Knake


Michigan State University - College of Law

Hannah Brenner


Michigan State University - College of Law

November 18, 2010

Temple Law Review, Vol. 84, p. 325, Spring 2012
MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-24

Abstract:     
Three women now sit on the United States Supreme Court, a fourth recently retired, suggesting the attainment of formal equality. Despite this appearance of progress, women remain significantly under-represented in major leadership roles within the legal profession, where they face extensive gender bias and stereotyping. This gender bias and stereotyping is also leveraged against women who are featured in the media, illustrated most vividly by coverage of the most recent Supreme Court nominations. Headlines from mainstream news, “Then Comes the Marriage Question” in the New York Times or “The Supreme Court Needs More Mothers” in the Washington Post, and from the online blog arena, “Elena Kagan v. Sonia Sotomayor: Who Wore it Better?” in AbovetheLaw.com or “Put a Mom on the Court” in TheDailyBeast.com, are just a sampling of those that emerged during the nomination period for Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, two highly accomplished, well-qualified nominees.

The gendered nature of these and other articles led us to conduct an empirical study using quantitative and qualitative content analysis to examine media coverage for every Supreme Court nominee since Justices Powell and Rehnquist, a starting-point selected in light of the feminist movement’s influence at the time. Our project sits at the unique interdisciplinary intersection of law, gender studies, mass media, and political science. This article presents results from the first phase of data analysis looking at the week following a president’s announcement of a nominee, and we report five preliminary findings. In identifying these findings, we assess the gendered portrayals of nominees to the Court, and we reflect upon how this knowledge might motivate the resolution of gender disparity in the legal profession’s pipeline to power.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: Supreme Court, media, gender, legal profession, women, inequality

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2010 ; Last revised: April 15, 2013

Suggested Citation

Knake, Renee Newman and Brenner, Hannah, Rethinking Gender Equality in the Legal Profession's Pipeline to Power: A Study on Media Coverage of Supreme Court Nominees (Phase I, The Introduction Week) (November 18, 2010). Temple Law Review, Vol. 84, p. 325, Spring 2012; MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1711344

Contact Information

Renee Newman Knake (Contact Author)
Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Hannah Brenner
Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
517-232-6804 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,145
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 171,850

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds