Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1711410
 
 

Footnotes (175)



 


 



Miranda's Hidden Right


Laurent Sacharoff


University of Arkansas School of Law

February 21, 2011

Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Miranda v. Arizona said that a suspect can waive her right to remain silent but also that she must invoke it. How can both be true about the same right? This article argues that the Miranda “right to remain silent” actually contains two sub-rights: the right not to speak, and the right to cut off police questioning. The Court has never distinguished these as two separate rights - instead usually using the term “right to remain silent” for both - and has thus created confusion over what can be waived and what must be invoked. But when we separate the two rights, we see that a suspect can waive the right not to speak but must invoke the right to cut off questioning - a premise implicitly confirmed by both the majority and the dissent in Berghuis v. Thompkins.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2010 ; Last revised: March 22, 2013

Suggested Citation

Sacharoff, Laurent, Miranda's Hidden Right (February 21, 2011). Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1711410

Contact Information

Laurent Sacharoff (Contact Author)
University of Arkansas School of Law ( email )
260 Waterman Hall
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,051
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 110,576
Footnotes:  175

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.359 seconds