Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1712503
 
 

References (33)



 


 



Board or Shareholders – Who Should Determine Management Compensation? A Model of Compensation Governance


Shivendu Shivendu


University of California, Irvine - The Paul Merage School of Business

Joseph Vithayathil


University of California, Irvine; The Paul Merage School of Business

November 20, 2010


Abstract:     
The efficacy of boards of directors as a critical governance institution has attracted increasing scrutiny in the wake of the recent financial meltdown. CEO compensation which consequentially determines overall management compensation in a firm, is a key governance decision entrusted with the board. A relevant, though unexplored question would be whether shareholders are better served by making the compensation decision themselves. In this paper, in a game theoretic set up, we analyze shareholder payoffs under the traditional delegated- governance structure wherein shareholders set the compensation of the board, but delegate the management compensation decision to the board, and contrast such delegated- governance with an alternate owner-governance structure wherein shareholders determine the compensation contracts for both the board and management. Under unobservable effort, we consider both deterministic and stochastic firm performance, jointly determined by the effort of the board and management. We find that shareholders are never worse off under owner-governance, though management wages as well as effort are higher under certain conditions. Within a deterministic setting, board wages as well as effort are equal or higher with centralized governance. Under extreme stochastic effects, which might describe boom or bust environments, it does not pay to incentivize the board or management to expend effort. In a stochastic environment where output is determined primarily by board effort, it does not pay to incentivize management for effort. Our analysis suggests a possible explanation for the puzzling observation of rising managerial compensation, often not in congruence with firm performance, as the board faces no penalty for misaligned managerial wages under delegated-governance. We show that owner-governance generally eliminates non-aligned incentive structures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: CEO Compensation, Incentive Wages, Board Of Directors, Say on Pay, Corporate Governance, Moral Hazard, Financial Meltdown

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 21, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Shivendu, Shivendu and Vithayathil, Joseph, Board or Shareholders – Who Should Determine Management Compensation? A Model of Compensation Governance (November 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1712503 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1712503

Contact Information

Shivendu Shivendu (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine - The Paul Merage School of Business ( email )
SB 342
Irvine, CA 92617
United States
Joseph Vithayathil
University of California, Irvine ( email ) ( email )
Irvine, CA California 92697-3125
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.merage.uci.edu
The Paul Merage School of Business ( email ) ( email )
Irvine, CA California 92697-3125
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.merage.uci.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,244
Downloads: 157
Download Rank: 111,712
References:  33

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.265 seconds