Abstract

 


 



Is Equality a Totally Empty Idea?


Anthony D'Amato


Northwestern University - School of Law

November 21, 2010

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 3, 1983
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-85

Abstract:     
Comments on Westen article The Empty Idea of Equality. The only way we know what direction to move in making reductions and increases in burdens is to have a concept of equality in mind. The only way we can know that one burden is 'great' and another burden is 'considerably lesser,' to use the words in Westen's standard, is to compare the burdens. But comparison presupposes a measure of equality, for we cannot know that one burden is greater than another unless we first have a concept of when the two burdens are equal. Westen's standard, therefore, is logically posterior to the concept of equality. If we start with the Equal Protection Clause, then a standard such as Westen's, which he attempts to ground in substantive due process, can be given operative content.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Concept of Equality, Equal Protection Clause, Substantive Due Process

JEL Classification: K40, K49, K10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 22, 2010  

Suggested Citation

D'Amato, Anthony, Is Equality a Totally Empty Idea? (November 21, 2010). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 3, 1983; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-85. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1712879

Contact Information

Anthony D'Amato (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 295
Downloads: 65
Download Rank: 175,989

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.453 seconds