Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1717037
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (376)



 


 



Insulating Agencies: Avoiding Capture Through Institutional Design


Rachel E. Barkow


New York University School of Law


Texas Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 15, 2010
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-82

Abstract:     
So-called independent agencies are created for a reason, and often that reason is a concern with agency capture. Agency designers hope that a more insulated agency will better protect the general public interest against interest group pressure. But the conventional approach to independent agencies in administrative law largely ignores why agencies are insulated. Instead, discussions about independent agencies in administrative law have focused on three features that have defined independent agencies: heads who are removable for cause by the President, an exemption from having to submit regulations to the President’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for cost-benefit analysis, and a multimember structure.

But these traditional characteristics of an independent agency are not the only, or necessarily even the most effective, ways in which insulation from interest groups and partisan pressure can be achieved. In fact, under modern conditions of political oversight, other design elements and mechanisms are often just as important if the goal is to create an agency that is best suited to achieve a long-term public-interest mission free from capture. This is particularly true of agencies tasked with protecting the general public in the face of one-sided and intense political pressure. This kind of lopsided pressure can be seen in a range of areas, from criminal justice to consumer protection.

The goal of this Article is to move the conversation about insulation beyond the traditional hallmarks of independence and identify overlooked elements of agency design, deemed equalizing factors, that are particularly well-suited to addressing the problem of capture in the context of asymmetrical political pressure. The Article identifies five such equalizing factors that have received little or no attention in the legal literature on independent agencies but that are critically important for insulation against one-sided interest group dominance. The Article then compares the effectiveness of traditional and equalizing factors in the context of consumer protection, an area with the kind of one-sided interest group pressure that is a breeding ground for capture. The Article explores the relationship between the institutional design of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and its effectiveness and uses those lessons to analyze the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the most significant new federal agency created in decades. This analysis of consumer protection regulatory agencies show-cases both the continuing danger of capture and the critical importance of institutional design in policing it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 30, 2010 ; Last revised: January 2, 2011

Suggested Citation

Barkow, Rachel E., Insulating Agencies: Avoiding Capture Through Institutional Design. Texas Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 15, 2010; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-82. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1717037

Contact Information

Rachel E. Barkow (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-992-8829 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,112
Downloads: 314
Download Rank: 54,255
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  376

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.282 seconds