Footnotes (304)



All in the Family: Towards a New Representational Model for Parents and Children

Cynthia Godsoe

Brooklyn Law School

November 30, 2010

Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 214

The presumption that parents act in their children’s interests governs both daily life and legal doctrine. This Article demonstrates that this presumption, while usually correct, is problematic when unquestioned because it masks any conflict between parents and children, and is at odds with the individualistic framework of the ethical rules governing attorneys. This harms families and puts attorneys at risk. This Article explores this representation problem in the previously largely ignored context of special education for children with disabilities. The Supreme Court, in Winkelman v. Parma City School District, recently established that parents and children each have substantive yet “intertwined” rights to a child’s appropriate education. Nonetheless, courts and attorneys continue to assume that parents speak for children, even in cases with a high risk of conflict.

To best serve families and protect attorneys, this Article proposes a novel reconception of representation in education cases. Family representation posits the family as the client, with the attorney owing duties to each member individually and as part of the group. A family representation framework brings four real-world benefits: (1) it recognizes the interconnected nature of the relationships and rights of parents and children; (2) it engages both parties in the process, particularly important for children who have previously been overlooked; (3) it is economical, increasing the number of represented parties but not the number of attorneys; and (4) it brings attorney practice into accord with ethical standards. This model has ramifications beyond the educational sphere as it could also be fruitfully applied in torts and benefits actions by a parent and child against the state or other third party. Ultimately, reconceiving the attorney’s role as representing the family while respecting the voices of each member harmonizes the competing principles of individual autonomy and family unity to the benefit of parents, children and attorneys.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: education, parent and child, professional responsibility, ethics, family representation

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 1, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Godsoe, Cynthia, All in the Family: Towards a New Representational Model for Parents and Children (November 30, 2010). Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 214. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1717852

Contact Information

Cynthia Godsoe (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 707
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 174,875
Footnotes:  304

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.329 seconds