Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1717903
 
 

Footnotes (26)



 


 



Masters of Their Own Eminent Domain: The Case for a Reliance Interest Associated with Economic Development Takings


David S. Yellin


Georgetown University Law Center

November 30, 2010

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 99, No. 2, 2011

Abstract:     
When the Supreme Court, in Kelo v. City of New London, held that economic development was a valid justification for the use of eminent domain, there was a massive public outcry. In the resulting backlash, many communities enacted legislation aimed at restricting economic development takings, but most of these reforms were largely symbolic and had little or no actual effect on such takings. This Note accepts the reality that economic development takings will inevitably occur, and identifies the greatest threat associated with such takings as the risk that when they do they may cause more harm than good. For example, after the failure of the development project at issue in Kelo, Pfizer has recently announced that they will be shutting down their facility in New London, Connecticut, taking 1,400 jobs with them. As a result, the price New London paid by condemning the homes of its residents has been for nothing and the city is left even worse off than before.

This Note analogizes the failures of eminent domain takings to some of the harms that arose during the rash of plant shut-downs in the 1980s and early 1990s. Faced with the loss of the foundations of local economies, municipalities and scholars alike tried to come up with ways to protect the reliance that communities place in economic actors. This Note argues that although many of these proposals were not suitable for responding to the problems of plant closings, they are well-suited to use in the takings context. To that end, I discuss key differences between the two scenarios that justify applying some of the most progressive of these proposals in the takings context. Specifically, I propose that courts recognize a reliance interest, similar to an easement, which gives a municipality a legally enforceable right against corporate entities that benefit from economic development takings.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Eminent Doman, Kelo, Economic Development, Takings, New London, Poletown, Reliance

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 2, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Yellin, David S., Masters of Their Own Eminent Domain: The Case for a Reliance Interest Associated with Economic Development Takings (November 30, 2010). Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 99, No. 2, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1717903

Contact Information

David S. Yellin (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 436
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 187,887
Footnotes:  26

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds