Do Not Disturb: Fourth Amendment Expectations of Privacy in Hotel Rooms
Jason C. Miller
affiliation not provided to SSRN
December 1, 2010
Seton Hall Circuit Review Vol. 7, No. 2
Do Not Disturb addresses the sometimes thorny issue of when occupants of a hotel room have standing under the Fourth Amendment to object to an illegal search of the room. This becomes particularly problematic when the occupant is not a typical hotel guest or violates a hotel policy. The Tenth Circuit requires an occupant to prove that he or she is a registered guest of the hotel, while the Sixth Circuit holds that invalid registration is the hotel’s concern alone.
Although hotel room rooms pose interesting Fourth Amendment problems, such as invalid registrations, fake names, guests of guests, and guests who stay beyond the rental period, this paper argues that the expectation of privacy in hotels should be measured in the same way that the Fourth Amendment deals with other types of residences and proposes that courts universally apply a rule requiring the hotel to act first to terminate the expectation of privacy of a guest who violates hotel policy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Keywords: Fourth Amendment Expectation of Privacy, Fourth Amendment Standing, Hotel Room, Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, Registration
Date posted: December 3, 2010 ; Last revised: December 16, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds