|
||||
|
||||
Collusion and the Choice of Auction: An Experimental StudyJeroen HinloopenUniversity of Amsterdam; Tinbergen Institute Sander OnderstalUniversity of Amsterdam; Tinbergen Institute November 30, 2010 Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 10-120/1 Abstract: We experimentally examine the collusive properties of two commonly used auctions: the English auction (EN) and the first-price sealed-bid auction (FPSB). In theory, both tacit and overt collusion are always incentive compatible in EN while both can be incentive compatible in FPSB if the auction is repeated and bidders are patient enough. We find that the auctions do not differ in subjects’ propensity to collude overtly and in the likelihood that subjects defect from a collusive agreement. Moreover, the average winning bid does not differ between the auctions unless subjects can collude overtly. Under overt collusion, stable cartels buy at a lower price in EN than in FPSB resulting in a lower average winning bid in EN.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21 Keywords: Collusion, English auction, First-price sealed-bid auction, Laboratory experiments JEL Classification: C92, D44, L41 working papers seriesDate posted: December 4, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds