Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1718998
 
 

Footnotes (56)



 


 



Reframing Libel: Taking (All) Rights Seriously and Where It Leads


Alastair Mullis


University of Leeds - School of Law

Andrew Scott


London School of Economics - Law Department

December 2, 2010

LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 20/2010

Abstract:     
In preparing this paper, we have returned to first principles and re-evaluated fundamental aspects of libel law, its purposes, its substance, and its processes. Our thinking has been informed by, first, philosophical understandings of democracy and the public sphere and in particular the role of freedom of speech and of the media therein, and secondly, the social psychology of reputation and privacy. By doing so, we are able to ground some of the proposals for reform made previously by Index on Censorship, English PEN, Lord Lester, and others. We do so, however, not through the prism of an over-weaned emphasis on freedom of expression, but rather by triangulating the rights and interests of claimants, defendants, and the wider public. Ultimately, we recommend a coherent set of significant substantive and procedural reforms that if enacted would enhance access to justice and reduce costs for all but the most serious and/or most damaging libels. This involves the recommendation of the introduction of a two-track libel regime.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: libel, defamation, freedom of expression, privacy, reputation, access to justice

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 14, 2010 ; Last revised: December 16, 2010

Suggested Citation

Mullis, Alastair and Scott, Andrew, Reframing Libel: Taking (All) Rights Seriously and Where It Leads (December 2, 2010). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 20/2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1718998 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1718998

Contact Information

Alastair Mullis (Contact Author)
University of Leeds - School of Law ( email )
Leeds LS2 9JT
United Kingdom
Andrew Scott
London School of Economics - Law Department ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,083
Downloads: 245
Download Rank: 71,389
Footnotes:  56

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.235 seconds