Footnotes (4)



Guidelines on How to Referee

Thom Brooks

Durham University

December 2, 2010

This essay offers clear practical advice on how to act as a referee when asked to review an article for an academic journal. The advice is also relevant for reviewing manuscript proposals for academic publishers. My advice is based on my experiences in editing an academic journal, the Journal of Moral Philosophy, and four book series. I will draw on these experiences throughout as illustrations. The structure of the advice is as follows. First, I will begin by saying a few words about the academic publishing industry. Secondly, I will discuss whether one should accept or decline an invitation to review. Thirdly, I will examine the question of what appropriate standard should be applied when reviewing submissions. Finally, I conclude with advice on how to draft a report before submitting it to an editor.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: publishing, publishing advice, referee, refereeing, refereeing advice, manuscript, review, journal, journals, articles, Brooks

JEL Classification: A00, K00

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 4, 2010 ; Last revised: January 5, 2015

Suggested Citation

Brooks, Thom, Guidelines on How to Referee (December 2, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1719043 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1719043

Contact Information

Thom Brooks (Contact Author)
Durham University ( email )
Durham Law School
Durham University
Durham, County Durham DH1 3ET
United Kingdom
+441913344365 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.dur.ac.uk/law/staff/?mode=staff&id=11140
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,085
Downloads: 1,931
Download Rank: 4,506
Footnotes:  4
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds