Abstract

 
 

References (23)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



A Comprehensive Structure to Help Analyze, Detect and Prevent Fraud


Alan Reinstein


Wayne State University

Mohamed E. Bayou


University of Michigan at Dearborn

June 28, 1999


Abstract:     
Merely relying on historical events to test for fraud occurrence often provides an insufficient basis to detect-let alone to prevent-it. Fraud, a multidimensional cyclical dynamic, exists not only as an event but also as a concept, intention, action and object needing a comprehensive structure to capture its critical elements and interactions among these elements. SAS No. 82, which addresses the practical aspect of fraud and guides auditors to consider the potential occurrence of fraud in financial statement audits, adopts a limited view of fraud. This paper augments this new Standard by constructing a comprehensive view of fraud consisting of two principal components: (1) a definition of fraud broader than SAS No. 82's definition, and (2) an anatomy of fraud with all of the aforementioned dimensions.

The anatomy of fraud and its dynamic content raise the question of whether fraud is cyclical or merely repetitive. This question has not been addressed in the auditing literature despite its primacy in distinguishing intentional and non-intentional irregularities and understanding the fundamental nature of the auditing function. While non-intentional errors are repeatable due to their identities, fraud cases are cyclical because of their similarities (Deleuze, 1994).

Analyzing fraud merely by its detection and prevention elements can lead to two fundamental weaknesses: structure and predictability. Fraud's cyclical nature, coherent elements and direction imply that even partial detection, via professional skepticism as SAS No. 82 describes, can uncover all of its drives, intents, actions and objects. Moreover, an actual fraud event, as an effect with circumstantial causes, renders fraud predictable by projection (the macro cause) and by similarities among fraud cases (the micro cause). The proposed comprehensive structure, encompassing intentional and unintentional irregularities, can help contain and prevent fraud even at its inception stage. To demonstrate how the comprehensive structure can help explain fraud's intricate elements, we analyze seven prominent fraud cases into their cyclical components and their implications to independent auditors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

JEL Classification: M49

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 16, 1999  

Suggested Citation

Reinstein, Alan and Bayou, Mohamed E., A Comprehensive Structure to Help Analyze, Detect and Prevent Fraud (June 28, 1999). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=172055 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.172055

Contact Information

Alan Reinstein (Contact Author)
Wayne State University ( email )
School of Business
Detroit, MI 48202
United States
248-357-2400 (Phone)
313-577-4530 (Fax)
Mohamed E. Bayou
University of Michigan at Dearborn ( email )
4901 Evergreen Road
School of Management
Dearborn, MI 48128-1491
United States
313-593-9962 (Phone)
313-593-5636 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,798
Downloads: 1,417
Download Rank: 5,159
References:  23
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.641 seconds