Abstract

 


 



The Voodoo We Do: Harm, Impossibility, and the Reductionist Impulse


Kevin Cole


University of San Diego School of Law

May 30, 1994

Journal of Contemporary Legal issues, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1994

Abstract:     
This article assesses the debate over "subjectivist" and "objectivist" accounts of criminal law through the familiar "voodoo doctor" example.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: criminal law theory, harm, subjectivism, objectivism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 8, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Cole, Kevin L., The Voodoo We Do: Harm, Impossibility, and the Reductionist Impulse (May 30, 1994). Journal of Contemporary Legal issues, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1721888

Contact Information

Kevin L. Cole (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 168
Downloads: 9

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds