Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722245
 


 



On Fallibility and Finality: Why Thinking Like a Qadi Helps Me Understand American Constitutional Law


Asifa Quraishi-Landes


University of Wisconsin Law School

2009

Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2009, No. 2, 2009
Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1233

Abstract:     
Despite the pejorative use of the word "qadi" in American constitutional case law, the institution of the judge (qadi) in Islamic legal history provides an illuminating lens through which to consider the nature of Supreme Court judging in the United States, specifically the intertwined roles of final adjudicator and ultimate expositor. Seeing the job of Supreme Court justices through the lens of the Muslim qadi, I believe, helps bring a new awareness of the choices made by Supreme Court justices when faced with the competing pulls of their methodological convictions, the nature of the United States legal system, and their sense of their role within it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Islamic law, sharia, fiqh, qadi, judge, judiciary, judicial, Supreme Court, methodology, constitutional law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2010 ; Last revised: October 10, 2013

Suggested Citation

Quraishi-Landes, Asifa, On Fallibility and Finality: Why Thinking Like a Qadi Helps Me Understand American Constitutional Law (2009). Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2009, No. 2, 2009; Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1233. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722245

Contact Information

Asifa Quraishi-Landes (Contact Author)
University of Wisconsin Law School ( email )
975 Bascom Mall
Madison, WI 53706
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 530
Downloads: 112
Download Rank: 144,246

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds