On Fallibility and Finality: Why Thinking Like a Qadi Helps Me Understand American Constitutional Law
University of Wisconsin Law School
Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2009, No. 2, 2009
Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1233
Despite the pejorative use of the word "qadi" in American constitutional case law, the institution of the judge (qadi) in Islamic legal history provides an illuminating lens through which to consider the nature of Supreme Court judging in the United States, specifically the intertwined roles of final adjudicator and ultimate expositor. Seeing the job of Supreme Court justices through the lens of the Muslim qadi, I believe, helps bring a new awareness of the choices made by Supreme Court justices when faced with the competing pulls of their methodological convictions, the nature of the United States legal system, and their sense of their role within it.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: Islamic law, sharia, fiqh, qadi, judge, judiciary, judicial, Supreme Court, methodology, constitutional lawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 11, 2010 ; Last revised: October 10, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.875 seconds