Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722721
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (63)



 


 



Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts


Martin Gelter


Fordham University School of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Mathias M. Siems


Durham University - Durham Law School; University of Cambridge - Centre for Business Research

March 22, 2011

Maastricht European Private Law Institute (M-EPLI) Working Paper No. 2011/03
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1722721

Abstract:     
Today, according to Anne Marie Slaughter, "judges see each other not only as servants and representatives of a particular polity, but also as fellow professionals in an endeavour that transcends national borders." Such interaction may take place in various forms. There is some direct transnational cooperation between supreme court judges, but in our project we focus on cross-citations as a form of influence. To be sure, the citation of a foreign court does not necessarily mean that foreign ideas were really a decisive consideration for the outcome of a case. Still, cross-citations can show to what extent courts use foreign law as a justification for a judicial decision.

In this short paper, which is part of a wider research project, we present and analyse some of our findings on cross-citations between ten European supreme courts. We managed to get access to the full text of almost all decisions of these ten courts for the period between 2000 and 2007. It total we considered 636,172 decisions and found 1,426 cross-citations. The paper is structured as follows: first, we summarise the data considered and the search methodology used. The next two parts present different ways to visualise these data: on the one hand three types of bar charts showing the citations per citing court, and on the other hand two network presentations of the cross-citations between the ten courts. Subsequently, we examine the relationship between incoming and outgoing citations, in particular whether some of the ten courts may be regarded as "the core" and others as "the periphery". Finally, we discuss possible policy implications, in particular in the context of the European Union.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: cross-citations, supreme courts, citation networks, judicial dialogue, network analysis, comparative law, comparative civil procedure

JEL Classification: A12, A13, B52, C21, C24, K00, K41, P48

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 12, 2010 ; Last revised: November 7, 2012

Suggested Citation

Gelter, Martin and Siems, Mathias M., Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts (March 22, 2011). Maastricht European Private Law Institute (M-EPLI) Working Paper No. 2011/03 ; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1722721. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722721

Contact Information

Martin Gelter
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
646-312-8752 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.fordham.edu/faculty/10929.htm
European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Brussels, B-1050
Belgium
HOME PAGE: http://www.ecgi.org/members_directory/member.php?member_id=621
Mathias M. Siems (Contact Author)
Durham University - Durham Law School ( email )
50 North Bailey
Durham, County Durham DH1 3ET
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.dur.ac.uk/mathias.siems
University of Cambridge - Centre for Business Research ( email )
Top Floor, Judge Business School Building
Trumpington Street
Cambridge, CB2 1AG
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/people/siems.htm
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,573
Downloads: 183
Download Rank: 73,514
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  63

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds