|
||||
|
||||
Intangible Assets, IFRS, and Analysts’ Earnings ForecastsKeryn ChalmersMonash University - Department of Accounting and Finance Greg ClinchUniversity of Melbourne - Department of Accounting Jayne M. GodfreyMonash University - Department of Accounting and Finance Zi WeiCentral University of Finance and Economics - School of Accountancy October 1, 2010 Accounting and Finance, Forthcoming Abstract: We investigate whether the adoption of IFRS in 2005 by Australian firms has been associated with a loss of potentially useful information about intangible assets, as conjectured by Matolcsy and Wyatt (2006). We find that the negative association between analyst forecast error magnitude/dispersion and aggregate reported intangibles previously documented becomes stronger subsequent to IFRS adoption, primarily for firms with high levels of underlying intangible assets. This is contrary to Matolcsy and Wyatt (2006)’s conjecture. Our result is largely due to reported goodwill, rather than other intangible assets, suggesting that the impairment approach to goodwill valuation required by IFRS conveys more useful information than does the former straight-line amortisation approach. When we investigate a sub-sample of firms that report lower intangibles under IFRS than under the prior Australian GAAP, we do find evidence consistent with the Matolcsy and Wyatt (2006) conjecture.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39 Keywords: IFRS, Analysts Forecasts, Intangible Assets JEL Classification: M40, M41 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 10, 2010 ; Last revised: September 22, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.000 seconds