Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1723215
 
 

Footnotes (189)



 


 



Court-Connected Arbitration in the Superior Court of Arizona: A Study of its Performance and Proposed Rule Changes


Roselle Wissler


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Bob Dauber


Arizona State University (ASU)

2007

Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 1, p. 65, 2007

Abstract:     
This article reports the findings of an empirical study of arbitration in Arizona's general jurisdiction civil trial courts. The study found that the arbitration program's primary goals of providing faster and less expensive resolution of cases, reducing the court's workload, and maintaining or enhancing the satisfaction of users, were not entirely being met. Many cases did not meet arbitration deadlines and court case processing time standards. Most cases eligible for arbitration concluded before a hearing was held, and those cases that had a hearing seemed more likely to have been diverted from settlement than from trial. Consequently, the arbitration program was likely to affect the court's workload in a relatively small proportion of cases, was more likely to reduce the use of court pretrial rather than trial resources, and was unlikely to substantially reduce litigants' costs. But arbitration did increase access to a hearing on the merits. Lawyers who represented clients in arbitration had generally favorable assessments of the process and award, but expressed concerns about the adequacy of arbitrators’ knowledge of both substantive issues and arbitration procedures. A majority of lawyers favored retaining compulsory arbitration and some of its basic components but changing policies relating to arbitrator service and assignment. These findings, which were consistent with studies in other jurisdictions, suggest that court-connected arbitration does not have negative consequences, but also does not consistently or substantially improve the effectiveness and efficiency of dispute resolution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, empirical research

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2010 ; Last revised: December 16, 2010

Suggested Citation

Wissler, Roselle and Dauber, Bob, Court-Connected Arbitration in the Superior Court of Arizona: A Study of its Performance and Proposed Rule Changes (2007). Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 1, p. 65, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1723215

Contact Information

Roselle Wissler (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Bob Dauber
Arizona State University (ASU) ( email )
Farmer Building 440G PO Box 872011
Tempe, AZ 85287
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 509
Downloads: 40
Footnotes:  189

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds