Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1723250
 


 



Barriers to Attorneys’ Discussion and Use of ADR


Roselle Wissler


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

2003

Dispute Resolution Magazine, Vol. 10, p. 27, 2003

Abstract:     
This article summarizes the findings of an empirical study involving a survey of Arizona civil litigators that examined their voluntary discussion and use of ADR and the prevalence of factors thought to act as barriers to ADR use. Most civil litigators discussed ADR with clients in most cases, but they were less likely to discuss ADR with opposing counsel and seldom did so early in the case. How frequently judges suggested the use of ADR was the factor most strongly related to how frequently attorneys discussed ADR with clients and opposing counsel and to how frequently they voluntarily used ADR. Attorneys' knowledge and views of ADR played a smaller role in their ADR discussions and use, although the potential cumulative effect of these factors was substantial. The implications of the findings for proposed approaches to increase voluntary ADR use are also discussed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 1

Keywords: alternative dispute resolution, mediation, empirical research

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Wissler, Roselle, Barriers to Attorneys’ Discussion and Use of ADR (2003). Dispute Resolution Magazine, Vol. 10, p. 27, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1723250

Contact Information

Roselle Wissler (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 231
Downloads: 25

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds