Footnotes (56)



A Machine Made of Words: Our Incompletely Theorized Constitution

Gregory Brazeal

U.S. Army JAG Corps

December 12, 2010

University of New Hampshire Law Review, Vol. 9, 2011

The conventional wisdom says that the U.S. Constitution represents "a comfortable and even emphatic agreement on... general principle, accompanied by sharp disagreement about particular cases." This essay draws attention to an often overlooked feature of the Constitution that lies in tension with the conventional view. For a document that is assumed to represent an agreement on general principles, the U.S. Constitution contains remarkably few statements of principle. In fact, an empirical analysis suggests that the U.S. Constitution has a good claim to containing the least abstract theorizing of any constitutional document of its era. The Constitution is thus an “incompletely theorized agreement” not only in the sense of being a work of broad theoretical agreement that breaks down at the level of particularity, but also in the sense of being an agreement on particular, concrete rules accompanied by disagreement on the abstract theories supporting those rules.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: u.s. constitution, human rights, abstract theorizing, general principles, rhetoric, comparative constitutional law, preamble

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 14, 2010 ; Last revised: September 9, 2011

Suggested Citation

Brazeal, Gregory, A Machine Made of Words: Our Incompletely Theorized Constitution (December 12, 2010). University of New Hampshire Law Review, Vol. 9, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1724402

Contact Information

Gregory Brazeal (Contact Author)
U.S. Army JAG Corps ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 523
Downloads: 90
Download Rank: 186,540
Footnotes:  56

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.297 seconds