Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1724817
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (175)



 


 



The Effects of Mandatory Mediation: Empirical Research on the Experience of Small Claims and Common Pleas Courts


Roselle Wissler


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

1997

Willamette Law Review, Vol. 33, p. 565, 1997

Abstract:     
This article reports the findings of empirical studies that examined the effects of mandatory mediation in small claims and general civil cases. The article begins with a discussion of the factors that led to the adoption of mandatory mediation and concerns that have been raised about its use. The studies compared cases that were required to use mediation and cases that voluntarily chose mediation in terms of the outcomes of mediation and party and attorney perceptions of the process, the mediator, and the outcome. Settlement rates were somewhat lower when mediation was mandatory than when both parties chose to mediate, with intermediate settlement rates when only one party requested mediation. Among cases that settled, there were no differences in the outcome or in parties' assessments of the agreement or compliance with it. There were few differences between mandatory and voluntary mediation in parties' perceptions of the mediation process and the mediator.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Mediation, alternative dispute resolution, empirical research

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Wissler, Roselle, The Effects of Mandatory Mediation: Empirical Research on the Experience of Small Claims and Common Pleas Courts (1997). Willamette Law Review, Vol. 33, p. 565, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1724817

Contact Information

Roselle Wissler (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,517
Downloads: 355
Download Rank: 47,568
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  175

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds