Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1724849
 
 

References (42)



 


 



An Approach to Quantitatively Measuring Collaborative Performance in Online Conversations


Paul Dwyer


Willamette University - Atkinson Graduate School of Management

December 13, 2010

Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27, pp. 1021-1032, 2011

Abstract:     
Interpersonal dynamics often hinder people from optimizing collaboration. Researchers who monitor the intellectual activity of people as they converse online receive less value when such collaboration is impaired. How can they detect suboptimal collaboration? This study builds on a new metric for measuring collaborative value from the information content of participant contributions to propose a measure of collaborative efficiency, and demonstrates its utility by assessing collaboration around a sample of weblogs. The new collaborative value metric can augment qualitative research by highlighting for deeper investigation conversational themes that triggered elevated collaborative production. Identifying these themes may also define the cognitive box people have built within a collaborative venue. Challenging people to consider fresh ideas by deliberately introducing them into collaborative venues is recommended as the key to overcoming collaborative dysfunction.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Collaboration, Cognitive Modeling, Collective Thinking

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 17, 2010 ; Last revised: August 10, 2014

Suggested Citation

Dwyer, Paul, An Approach to Quantitatively Measuring Collaborative Performance in Online Conversations (December 13, 2010). Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27, pp. 1021-1032, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1724849

Contact Information

Paul Dwyer (Contact Author)
Willamette University - Atkinson Graduate School of Management ( email )
900 State Street
Salem, OR 97301
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 334
Downloads: 14
References:  42
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds