Compulsory Arbitration Changes Proposed: Time to Comment
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
Arizona State University (ASU)
43 Arizona Attorney, Vol. 43, p. 27, 2007
This article summarizes the discussions and recommendations of the Committee on Compulsory Arbitration in the Superior Court of Arizona that form the basis of proposed changes to the Arbitration Rules and the authorizing statute. The proposed changes include increasing the maximum jurisdictional limit for arbitration, increasing arbitrator compensation and permitting CLE credit for arbitrator service, and altering some aspects of the process and associated deadlines to enhance efficiency. In addition, the committee proposed requiring wholly dispositive motions to be decided by the trial judge instead of the arbitrator and expanding the evidence admissible at arbitration hearings beyond that permitted by the Rules of Evidence. The article also explains the reasons behind the Committee's decision to retain other aspects of the arbitration system.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, courtsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 15, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds